How to Brief a Case Using the “IRAC” Method.
Legal Principals and precedent cases are used in each analysis, even if there is overlap among Plaintiffs (the same precedent can be applied to both parties, if appropriate. See example 2). It is acceptable to refer the reader to another point in the paper, rather than rewriting it word for word, if the situation calls for the same legal recommendation.
IRAC Method for Legal Writing. The IRAC method that is commonly used for legal writing, helps break down fact patterns, complex terminology, and complicated legal analysis into easy to understand blocks of text. Generally, IRAC format is used in bar exams and law school for solving hypothetical questions.
IRAC (Issue Rule Analysis Conclusion) is another common approach to legal writing, where, instead of starting with your conclusion, you merely state what the issue is. I view IRAC as being more akin to a mystery novel than an informative memo because, instead of coming out and disclosing your conclusion from the outset, you are keeping the reader in suspense until the end of your section.
Though it sounds really simple, legal reasoning or analysis may not be that simple, especially for law students. So various methods have been formulated to make the process easier to understand. IRAC is one such method of legal reasoning. What is the IRAC Method? IRAC is the acronym for Issue, Rules, Application (Analysis), and Conclusion.
You want to write a prediction that gives the reader confidence in your answer. You support your prediction with the law and the facts. Keep in mind that the legal reader is cautious and skeptical, and has a professional obligation to thoroughly vet your predictive memo.
The Discussion section of a legal memorandum should be structured similarly to how you would write a law school exam. Just as in a law school exam, you should assume that the reader has a basic understanding of the law (so that you do not need to explain basic legal principles) but that the reader does not know the precise rules of law and facts at issue in your fact pattern.
Legal Analysis: CREAC vs. IRAC My whole 1L year, I heard nothing but IRAC so that's what I did. It's how I briefed my cases and how I tackled my essay responses on my finals and it worked just fine for me.